DescriptionRegister Today! Profile Home Archive Album Friends DashboardManager Add Blog Post Manage Categories Edit Template Choose New Template Recent Entries- Jealousy, I Name Thee... Me? - Here's What's Keeping Me Busy - We've Lost Another One - Wild Thing - Bones CategoriesBookwormGeekNews Movie Review Personal Quote Of The Week Ramblings Rant-A-Thon The Inferno FriendsCabinfeveronlinesarai birdsnest photostyle WelshPixie Eclectablog bitzky womanoffeathers bebbet OgreJehosephatt Twist CleanNeedles texican annmi treasa pd donald113 etainne Quacksplats blogawards Rubicon littleMissConfused 1KatyaBerlin honeychild cherry |
Eli Stone - Or, How I Learned Not To Be Bothered By My Painful Ankle, And Learned To LaughIt's time for Part 2 of "TV Shows I Watched While Nursing My Leg".
10:22 - 2008-Jul-31 - comments {3} - post commentA Silent Guardian, A Watchful ProtectorSPOILER FREE
The problem with eagerly anticipated major motion picture events is, that they never live up to the expectations. When a movie is dubbed as the greatest this or best that, the hype alone delivers the killshot. We've seen it before. Phantom Menace died not because it's a bad movie (it isn't great either), but because no movie can meet demands like that. And so it is, that The Dark Knight too fails to meet it's expectations. Instead, it takes the previously unprecedented move of surpassing all the demands it was expected to reach. It goes beyond all the hype. Two months ago it was said that Iron Man has set the bar on how superhero movies are made. The Dark Knight sets the bar on how movies are made, period. It's a superhero movie where the superhero is not the main focus. Instead it gives more time for the bad guy, developing the character of Joker to it's fullest extent. There has been a lot of talk recently about Heath Ledger getting a posthumous Oscar nomination for his role as the Joker. I get it know. Enough time is also given to secondary characters, casting light on both their strengths and flaws, allowing them go fluidly to where the story takes them. The Dark Knight provides action, comedy, thrilling moments, and honest to god tragedy not simply as an end, but as a means to a greater end. It is storytelling you expect from a four hour drama, not from a superhero movie. Christopher Nolan has taken Batman from the hell Joel Schumacher took the character to in the late 90's. In Batman Begins you feel Batman is vindicated, he's no longer a mockery of what he used to be. He's a hero. In The Dark Knight, Nolan takes Batman in to a world so deep, so dark, that he is nearly consumed by his own rage. But, as Harvey Dent said, the night is darkest just before the dawn, and as long as Batman is out there... there will always be another dawn. Because he's the hero Gotham deserves, but not the one it needs right now...and so we'll hunt him, because he can take it. Because he's not a hero. He's a silent guardian, a watchful protector...a Dark Knight. - James Gordon
01:10 - 2008-Jul-25 - comments {11} - post commentStargate ContinuumSpace travel, time travel, massive space battles and lots of science jargon. No, it's not Doctor Who, it's the long awaited Stargate Continuum.
![]() After Ba'al rewrites the timeline, what is left of SG-1 are left on their own, with little time to correct what Ba'al has done, before Earth and all of the galaxy will fall. Oh, and Jack is back. The story is one that has been visited many times in the Stargate universe. Altered timelines and repairing them. However, this time there is a twist. Is it morally right to alter a timeline which is the wrong one for a few, but the correct one for billions of others? In a way, it's a new take on the old Star Trek philosophy, with the Vulcan phrase "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" pitted against captain Kirk's "Sometimes the needs of the one outweigh the needs of the many, or the few". The movie itself is like one big fan service. It is as if the writers and producers all went in to a big room and someone, probably Martin Wood went "ok guys, this may be the last SG-1 movie we ever make, and we need to make it perfect". And then Brad Wright said something like "how about we resurrect every single character ever written out of the series". And then they just built on that idea. The amazing thing is, it worked. It's a massive fan service, with a proper plot, great dialogue, actual drama and thrilling action sequnces. If this is to be the last Stargate SG-1 movie, they really did not go quietly in to that good night. They went in a roar of thunder and fire. We get rid of the last bad guy... and then there's cake.
General Jack O'Neill
04:34 - 2008-Jul-4 - comments {8} - post commentHulk SmashThe new Hulk movie delivers what it promises in it's title. The Hulk really is Incredible. Maybe not so much as a movie, but as a geekfest, it scores high in the geek points. Using the old melancholic theme from the old Hulk series of the 70's, and a cameo by the original Hulk, Lou Ferrigno, the movie certainly knows how to cater to it's core fanbase.
11:16 - 2008-Jun-19 - comments {51} - post commentThe Ark Of TruthSunday night I watched the screener of the upcoming Stargate - The Ark Of Truth.
![]() A quick flashback to recent events: With the help of the Ancient "Merlin", SG-1 was able to kill the Ori. Soon there after Adria ascended and hasn't been seen since. And Teal'c has aged 50 years, after sacrificing a portion of his life to save the team from a bubble in time. For the past few months, SG-1 has searched the galaxy for an Ancient artifact known as the Ark Of Truth, which they believe is the key to defeating the Ori armies. However, the Ark is not a weapon, not in any conventional way. The Ark has the power to "brainwash" people, to make them see the truth. It is this aspect of control why the Alterans (Ancients) never used the weapon themselves, because they believed that there was nothing more sacred in the universe, than freedom of choice. A belief shared by Daniel Jackson. After gaining the help of Tomin, Vala's ex-husband and a commander in the Ori army, their search takes the team to the very heart of the Ori galaxy. But the journey is not an easy one, because the IOA has plans of their own, and those plans don't include SG-1 finding the Ark. So why was the movie so goddamn awesome? Well for starters, it's Stargate. That alone makes it worthy of praise. But it really is well done. It fits seamlessly in to the series, it develops the characters further, and it leaves the door open for new adventures. Also, as it is made for DVD, there is new rules for language (the word asshole really does sound odd when said by a member of SG-1) and there is a slight increase in gore. But other than that, the basic elements that have made Stargate a franchise lasting over a decade are all there. Witty dialogue, odd sense of humor, spine tingling action and finely tuned sci fi. Now then, there is a snag in all this. Those who haven't seen the series, especially the last two seasons, get nothing from this movie. It makes no sense to them. It is made with the idea that those watching it already know what has happened, and don't need everything explained, so it doesn't waste much time with "Previously on Stargate SG-1" type of moments. But to those who are fans of the series and know what a Prior is or who Adria was, will enjoy this movie as the lump of science fiction gold that it is. It's offcial - SG-1 is back. 10:25 - 2008-Jan-8 - comments {16} - post comment
|
||||
EFX2 Template Design © WelshPixie | |||||